Comments on: Balenciaga Crimes Against Humanity https://godammit.com/balenciaga-crimes-against-humanity/ And I'm getting madder. Sun, 12 Feb 2023 03:33:53 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.3 By: Norm https://godammit.com/balenciaga-crimes-against-humanity/comment-page-1/#comment-2780310 Sun, 12 Feb 2023 03:33:53 +0000 https://godammit.com/?p=15247#comment-2780310 So, do you think I should return my Balenciaga sneakers that I refuse to wear bc of this ad incident?

]]>
By: Sister Wolf https://godammit.com/balenciaga-crimes-against-humanity/comment-page-1/#comment-2777024 Sat, 10 Dec 2022 22:58:54 +0000 https://godammit.com/?p=15247#comment-2777024 Bevitron – I’m always a little remorseful for bringing your attention to something frivolous. On the other hand, your suggestion of the kids wearing pantaboots proves it was the right thing to do!

Romeo – Zero erection.

Alison – Oh good, thank you for seeing punk instead of B&D! and making me laugh re shapeless normcore.

]]>
By: Alison https://godammit.com/balenciaga-crimes-against-humanity/comment-page-1/#comment-2777001 Sat, 10 Dec 2022 09:11:59 +0000 https://godammit.com/?p=15247#comment-2777001 Pretty astute of you to point out the punk aesthetic, which is probably what they were aiming for. I struggle to see how anyone could find even a whiff of eroticism in those photos, or how the the kids themselves were being abused. Am I missing something? That would mean every single ad campaign for children’s clothing is pornographic, judging from the shapeless normcore these tots are modeling. Because they’re in the same frame as some tatty stuffed bears? Evil is in the eye of the beholder.
Pantaboots! You score again by bringing up the hygiene deficiency, haha! The name was enough to make me throw up in my mouth, but that took it to a whole other level for me.

]]>
By: Romeo https://godammit.com/balenciaga-crimes-against-humanity/comment-page-1/#comment-2776873 Wed, 07 Dec 2022 23:23:57 +0000 https://godammit.com/?p=15247#comment-2776873 There’s a difference between nudity and nakedness, but I forget which one is sexualized. Nudity, I think. Anyway, a picture of a naked kid isn’t necessarily pornographic. But also too one time a lady showed me a picture of her dog who was evidently quite excited by having his photo taken and I thought that this was part of some weird seduction thing and it made me very uncomfortable.

So I guess I have to ask if this picture of yours shows the little girl with an erection. Well? Does it?

]]>
By: Bevitron https://godammit.com/balenciaga-crimes-against-humanity/comment-page-1/#comment-2776831 Wed, 07 Dec 2022 08:10:43 +0000 https://godammit.com/?p=15247#comment-2776831 I’m so glad you bring this stuff to my attention, otherwise I’d never know much of what’s going on in this world. Except maybe the miserable Herschel Walker thing, since living down here, it’s impossible to not know all about it, which believe me, I really would rather not.

Of course I agree with you about the Balenciaga commotion, except maybe even more so since I didn’t notice the B&D&S&M/punk stuffed animals at all. Just saw the cute kids, like you said. Now if the toys had been outfitted is SS uniforms or terrorist garb, I think I would’ve picked right up on that. But, they weren’t, and is there some protesting too much? Without even asking, I know my therapist agrees with us. Or with me anyway, not wanting to drag you into my therapeutic relationship.

Now those Pantaboots, here’s the thing, in addition to the whole general nauseating idea of them that you covered perfectly – I bet they hurt like absolute fucking torture to wear. They probably rub every crack and crevice (or crevasse, in her case) raw from waist to toe. I’m positive they force bunions and hammertoes on once normal feet, and I’d bet money they grow killer athlete’s foot. I am just so glad the whoevers at Balenciaga didn’t put the kids in pantaboots. And Jeez I hope I’m not giving them any ideas.

]]>