Comments on: Not Better Than a Poke in the Eye https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/ And I'm getting madder. Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:02:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: atlanta homes https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-194329 Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:02:09 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-194329 I enjoyed reading & I must say that I was very impressed with your writing skills. Keep up the good work it’s very refreshing to see someone like you 🙂

]]>
By: Psyrix https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-91199 Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:33:53 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-91199 How can these stupid cunts be so popular. My god they are all butt ugly and if I got really drunk and picked any one of them up I would still drive 40 miles out of my way just to drop off the ugly bitch in the worst part of the city and forget it ever happened. Shit stuff like this just pisses me off to no end.

]]>
By: Nephew Wolf https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-88860 Wed, 26 May 2010 05:41:27 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-88860 Anyway, in my haste to comment, I forgot to tell you what moved me to comment in the first place: Americana at Brand (for those of you outside of Southern California, it’s a particularly dumb mall in Glendale) is having a special Sex And The City event on May 27 from 6 to 10 PM, during which time if one is A Certain Kind Of Woman, one can get together with one’s “girlfriends” and watch the film and dance to 80s music (interesting demographic detail, that) and get drunk on the semi-cheap and talk about “dating” or whatever the fuck Certain Kinds Of Women talk about while drunk.

And if, like Sister Wolf and apparently every woman I know, you are mystified by the phenomenon of this TV series and movie franchise, you can either avoid Americana at Brand more assiduously than usual on May 27, or make a point of going there to observe it close up.

]]>
By: mimi https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-88603 Mon, 24 May 2010 23:11:09 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-88603 i love that it is cool to hate the series now.

i started watching when i was seventeen – in no way could relate, but it was entertaining and the clothes were pretty. was that enough to get me hooked? yes, im not precious about my tv viewing. if i find it entertaining, i’ll watch it. is it realistic? no, but sorry i watch reality for fantasy/escapism/fun.

i loved the tv episodes, still do, i’ll happily go back and watch them. but i never liked carrie. her life was such a mess. i hate hate hate (emphasise HATE) the movie, because even though i loved the fashion side of it, that’s all the movie was about. look at my handbags! look at my shoes! look at my wedding dress. it was too materialistic, even for a girly girl like me. i fear the second movie will be even worse.

]]>
By: Aja https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-88107 Sat, 22 May 2010 05:03:34 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-88107 I agree with many of the thoughts on this thread. My sisters and I watched the series premiere together on a whim and deemed it “our new favourite show”. Forgive me, I was young and foolish (and in high school at the time, therefore it all looked so glam in comparison to my suburban life). Though I enjoyed the series through the years, the hipster in me shouted “ABSOLUTELY NOT” once stupid people started referring to themselves as “Carrie” and talking about the show’s characters as if they were people they knew in real life. I took a class titled “women in the media” and it made me sad because half the girls just wanted to discuss Sex In The City. No matter what we were discussing, someone would bring the conversation back to Carrie and I would hang my head in absolutely shame.

And good god, how hard do I dislike Jennifer Hudson for playing that stupid role in the first movie. She was so terribly predictable, it made me want to throw my popcorn at the screen and leave. Let’s just accept every degrading, silly role that comes our way, why don’t we?

But having finished my tirade, I could see myself going to see the second one. Strictly for the outfits and the stupid story line. We all need a bit of fluff in our lives, don’t we?

]]>
By: Mary https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-88092 Sat, 22 May 2010 02:14:40 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-88092 I must be one of those ‘certain kind’ of women.

]]>
By: Nephew Wolf https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-88089 Sat, 22 May 2010 01:41:38 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-88089 None, and I mean none, of the females in any of my immediate social circles give a flying fuck about Sex and the City, except to the extent that they are contemptuous of it. I think it’s a certain kind of woman that responds to this shit. And if I knew exactly *what* kind of woman that is, this comment would be more articulate.

]]>
By: Audi https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-88079 Fri, 21 May 2010 23:22:48 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-88079 If there was a chance that all 4 of them die at the end of the movie, I might go out and see SATC 2.

]]>
By: fashion herald https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-88056 Fri, 21 May 2010 19:12:31 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-88056 I loved the beginning of the series also, it was better written than the later seasons. And I was oddly surprised that I liked the movie. It was hugely flawed, but I couldn’t get over the scene with SJP in no makeup! But it’s pure urban fantasy, I wouldn’t take it seriously for a second, clothing, Manolos, that guy from the Alaska show and all.

]]>
By: felicia https://godammit.com/not-better-than-a-poke-in-the-eye/comment-page-2/#comment-88053 Fri, 21 May 2010 18:55:28 +0000 http://www.godammit.com/?p=5054#comment-88053 well, I wouldn’t vote for him. and I’d use protection…

]]>