{"id":12068,"date":"2017-02-16T01:29:35","date_gmt":"2017-02-16T09:29:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/?p=12068"},"modified":"2017-02-16T01:29:35","modified_gmt":"2017-02-16T09:29:35","slug":"hookers-sluts-sex-workers-feminists-or-first-ladies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/hookers-sluts-sex-workers-feminists-or-first-ladies\/","title":{"rendered":"Hookers, Sluts, Sex-Workers, Feminists or First Ladies?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Okay, this is a complicated story and I’m pretty stoned. But stick with me.<\/p>\n There’s a model\/actress named Emily Something<\/strong> who is mostly known for her large breasts. I almost wrote “big tits” but stopped myself. Anyway, she was at some celebrity event where she was seated next to a New York Times reporter.<\/p>\n The reporter made a comment about Melania Trump<\/strong>, referring to her as a “hooker.”<\/p>\n So the Emily girl goes to Twitter<\/strong> and scolds the reporter for the sexist comment, tweeting:<\/p>\n Sat next to a journalist from the NYT last night who told me ‘Melania is a hooker.’ Whatever your politics it’s crucial to call this out for what it is: slut shaming. I don\u2019t care about her nudes or sexual history and no one should.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n followed by<\/p>\n Gender specific attacks are disgusting sexist bullshit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n (sniff.)<\/p>\n Melania Trump heard about Emily defending her, and used her FLOTUS<\/strong><\/a> account to tweet her thanks:<\/p>\n Applause to all women around the world who speak up, stand up and support other women! @<\/span>emrata<\/span><\/a> #<\/span>PowerOfEveryWoman<\/span><\/a> #<\/span>PowerOfTheFirstLady<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Wow, Melania is woman, hear her roar!<\/p>\n Then<\/em>, Emily retweets a person who also defends Melania’s honor with the following lecture:<\/p>\n <\/a>and Emily adds, “Bravo!”<\/p>\n Okay. So, on the one hand, Emily is all “How dare you call Melania a hooker!” and on the other hand, salutes the notion that being a hooker is a personal, valid choice. I don’t think we can trust this Emily.<\/p>\n Emily has those large breasts and she will get them out at the drop of a hat. She writes essays about how she and Kim Kardashian<\/strong><\/a> are being feminist when they show their huge tits, I mean bosoms. Emily wants to get your attention and then scold you while lording it over you. Her tits are everywhere. I don’t know how we could possibly satisfy her need to get them out. Maybe she could become a wet nurse. It’s a valid choice!<\/p>\n Meanwhile, Emily is threatening to sue a photographer<\/a> who took a million nude pictures<\/strong> of her five years ago before she knew she was going to be a feminist. So she’s really mad. She doesn’t look mad in the photos but that was then.<\/p>\n Leaving Emily’s tits for just a moment, if we may, and getting back to the poor reporter, he has apologized profusely for his unseemly comment, and The New York Times has issued an apology for him as well.<\/p>\n The reporter happens to be the son of Carl Bernstein<\/a>, one of the two guys who broke the Watergate<\/strong> story.<\/p>\n To sum up, we have a validly slutty model\/actress who shamed a reporter for suggesting that the First Lady is a hooker even though Bravo for Hookers; and The New York Times has to apologize, even though the Washington Post didn’t have to apologize when his dad broke the Watergate story.<\/p>\n Or: Tits + Hooker – Sex Worker + Twitter x Shaming -Reporters = FLOTUS -Watergate.<\/p>\n Thoughts or explanations?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Okay, this is a complicated story and I’m pretty stoned. But stick with me. There’s a model\/actress named Emily Something who is mostly known for her large breasts. I almost wrote “big tits” but stopped myself. Anyway, she was at … Continue reading