{"id":13667,"date":"2023-07-04T16:29:15","date_gmt":"2023-07-04T23:29:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/?p=13667"},"modified":"2023-07-04T16:29:15","modified_gmt":"2023-07-04T23:29:15","slug":"all-the-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/all-the-words\/","title":{"rendered":"All the Words!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Annual lists of new words are usually a treasure trove of portmanteau and tech slang, with something for everyone to screech “EW!” about. The American Dialect Society’s list for 2022 is rich in both, predominately youth culture slang that slipped right by me, like “rizz.” I\u00a0 generally like to keep up, but not knowing what rizz means was actually a blessing in disguise. In fact, it’s such an annoying word\u00a0 that I’m choosing to believe it doesn’t even exist (like “goblin mode”).<\/p>\n

Getting back to The American Dialect Society, its word for 2022 is the suffix “-ussy” from \u201cpussy\u201d<\/p>\n

(as in \u201cbussy\u201d = \u201cboy pussy,\u201d now humorously attached to many
\nwords) also -ussification: the process of creating new blended words with the -ussy suffix.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Runners-up included “quiet quitting”, “nepo baby”, “Dark Brandon”, and BFFR.<\/p>\n
Words and terms about gender issues have proliferated in the last year, and here it’s hard not to sound reactionary in response to how difficult they are to navigate. In 2018, Amherst College posted a document titled Common Language Guide, with a 40 page glossary of terms serving \u201ca need to come to a common and shared understanding of language…around identity, privilege, oppression and inclusion.\u201d<\/p>\n
Uh-oh. Here’s how the guide defines heterosexuality:<\/p>\n
\u201cA term developed as diagnosis of the hyper-infatuation with a different sex, first used by sexologist Karl-Maria Kertbeny in 1868…. [It] is used today to denote the normalized dominant sexual identity.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Hmph! Now I feel a little less-than, know what I mean? I was comfortable with being hetero but now I see I might need to apologize for it. The definition of femininity is more strident, so brace yourselves. It includes the subtle admonishment, “Performing femininity in a culturally established way is expected of people assigned female at birth.\u201d In this view, femininity is fraudulent, a performance, unless you’re queer or trans.<\/p>\n
The\u00a0 guide warns against \u201chomonormativity,\u201d or<\/p>\n
the ever-present phenomenon where members of the LGBTQ+ community subscribe to heteronormative approximations of intimate, romantic and sexual lives that are the product of white, neoliberal (capitalist), sexist, transmisogynistic and cissexist norms.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
And that’s fine, up to a point. That point would be the inability to converse with other humans without stepping into a minefield of acronyms designed to recognize categories of “identity.” Yesterday, I encountered the term “persons with male bodies” for the first time. Keep it up, you guys (okay, not “guys, how about “comrades?) and life will be one big microaggression.<\/p>\n
Apparently, the document has been removed from the college website but I feel enriched by learning the term transmisogynoir (\u201cthe marginalization of black trans women and trans feminine people that is inclusive of transphobia, racism, and misogyny, and how all of these intersect.\u201d) Now that’s a wonderful portmanteau, not as good\u00a0 as mansplaining but still music to the ear.<\/p>\n
Just yesterday, I read the word “manfluencer” and laughed out loud. Adding man as a prefix, like mancave and manosphere, is always fun, but I hunger for more and better manonyms, like the one I made up to describe male sulking: “mannui” (pronounced, duh, m\u00e4n-wee). At the same time, I can’t stand terms with lady thrown in, like “ladyboner,” ladyparts, or even Lady Gaga. Words can have different effects on different people, but some are universally disliked (moist) or enjoyed (gossamer). Just recently, I’ve been especially sensitive to “lived experience.” It’s so, so awful.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
Young people today are inventing words that infantalize, like lil, smol, feels, and adulting, which handily explains their entire stance. Good for them. I’m just glad I can still use dope and wack to signal my feels, in case they are interested. And I have my own list of words that I’m ready to banish for 2023. Here they are:<\/p>\n
Yassss (a perennial scourge, like “journey”)
\nthicc
\nthirsty
\nfam
\nmain character
\nif I’m honest
\nGOAT
\ncheck all the boxes
\nunderstood the assignment
\npro tip
\ncringe
\nfire<\/p>\n
But here’s something<\/a> to feel good about: Compared to their older counterparts, Gen Z are more concerned about how they use slang in conversation. Nearly half (46%) of Gen Z Americans worry about using slang terms incorrectly, compared to 32% of Baby Boomers.<\/p>\n
Love to see it.<\/p>\n
As I’m always saying, words matter! Unless you excel at interpretive dance, use them with care. Or to quote Jules in Pulp Fiction: English, Motherfucker!<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
*disclosure: Some have expressed concern about my absence. I’m finding it hard to write, due to senility and existential malaise. So don’t worry, I’m still here. Sort of. xo<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Annual lists of new words are usually a treasure trove of portmanteau and tech slang, with something for everyone to screech “EW!” about. The American Dialect Society’s list for 2022 is rich in both, predominately youth culture slang that slipped … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15299,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[968,6],"tags":[446,664,96],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/godammit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/yasss-queen.jpg?fit=500%2C474&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7t44M-3yr","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13667"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13667"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15305,"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13667\/revisions\/15305"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15299"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}