{"id":488,"date":"2007-09-13T18:06:54","date_gmt":"2007-09-14T02:06:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/godammit.com\/2007\/09\/13\/my-pseuds-corner\/"},"modified":"2007-09-13T18:18:29","modified_gmt":"2007-09-14T02:18:29","slug":"my-pseuds-corner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/godammit.com\/my-pseuds-corner\/","title":{"rendered":"My Pseud’s Corner"},"content":{"rendered":"
The great British satire magazine Private eye had a feature called ‘Pseud’s Corner,’ where any kind of pseudo-intellectual discourse was mocked. I miss it! So here’s my first tribute, and it’s a good one:<\/p>\n
In the Los Angeles Times, tin-eared pop music critic Ann Powers<\/a> reviewed poor Britney’s VMA appearance, and recalled a time when Britney’s “gorgeous form and defiant beauty”<\/em> were “postively Nabokovian.”<\/em><\/p>\n Aaaaaah! First read Lolita, you idiot, before you refer to it. Lolita was 12 years old, and distinctly childlike. That was the point. God, I hate Ann Powers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The great British satire magazine Private eye had a feature called ‘Pseud’s Corner,’ where any kind of pseudo-intellectual discourse was mocked. I miss it! So here’s my first tribute, and it’s a good one: In the Los Angeles Times, tin-eared … Continue reading